2/20/11

REVIEW

Undressing Attitudes – a review of Book of the Dead

Kgebetli Moele’s second book after controversial Room 207 should be read by all young girls currently doing Grade 12 before they go to tertiary and be exposed to ‘players’ and casanovas because it speaks a language they will be comfortable with. They might find the subject matter a little offensive, especially its flirting treatment in The Book of the Dead, but the truths contained in it should shock them before they gain ‘independence’ and think they have the dating game figured out. The dating game always has an ace up its sleeve and figuring it out means a lifetime of boredom – it’s its maze and curved ball twists that make it worth playing.

Moele’s language as he delves deep into the topic of sex and infection is crude, unpolished and at your face. He makes no attempt to write better than he actually speaks. It’s a narrative to the last dot. His vocabulary and grammar are often dodgy, evidence of chiselling by a shrewd literary editor. One has a feeling the book could have died in his imagination if a sculptor was not deployed to give it its aesthetic. Overall, the syntax, which is pretty lucid is saved by Moele’s exceptional storytelling skills. His lack of a distinct imagery is saved by his descriptive narrative style.

The rich content makes this book worthy of being read. While tackling a controversial theme, Moele’s use of a second person saves him from all the finger pointing that would have followed a first person narrative. That the author lacks remorse and does not attempt to inject humanity into KhutÅ¡o often flies in the face of the country’s battle against the pandemic of HIV and AIDS. However, given that Nelson Mandela said, “AIDS is no longer just a disease, it is a human rights issue”, it is a relief that the strong medicine to alleviate such ills comes in the form of a novel. The story of the country’s fight against HIV and AIDS transcends time and is a global battlefield.

Moele’s book would appeal to all South Africans across the racial divide, even though it is a black man’s journey into hell. Its social cohesion element will be on raising debate about inter-racial sex and infection. That author’s casualisation of sex wouldn’t sit well with some races. However anything go get South Africans talking across the racial and social divide deserves an award for nation building.

I fail to understand why the author chose to demarcate his book into two themed booklets; Book of the Life and Book of the Dead. While the author might consider this creative as he prepares the reader for a wake-up call, it however is only saved by his impeccable writing skills and innovation. I would grant an award to this book for its message of bravery.

*Kgebetli Moele’s Book of the Dead won the South African Literary Award’s Sello K Duiker Award in 2010


TO COMMENT ON THIS POST GO TO OUR FACEBOOK PAGE: THE Kasiekulture BLOG & write your comment on the wall

2/14/11

REVIEW

I Eat Sushi Where I Like – Revisiting Steve Biko

















Steve Bantu Biko came way ahead of his time – when one analyses what has been happening in this country in recent history; the political Black on Black killings in Mpumalanga, the political literal back-stabbings in the Western Cape, the traction in COPE and the self-hate that has engulfed the Black middle class since 1994.

Maybe Biko came in time before the crass materialism and vulgarity of excess that characterises our democratic order could poison his altruistic spirit. We have seen great men drink from the fountain of greed and become beasts we never knew existed. I Write What I Like, a collection of his essays is still in need of a peer. Those who tried to undo the good work wrote dodgy capitalist encyclopaedias such as Capitalist Nigger (Chika Onyeani) and Architects of Poverty (Moeletsi Mbeki). Biko provided a benchmark at times bigger than his own influences such as Franz Fanon, W.E.B du Bois and Malcolm X. For anyone who has indulged Biko's nectar and those of his ilk it is undoubted that earlier nationalists and social scientists fed a lot into his muse.

For a man who was as well-read as Biko the language deployed in articulating the role of Black people in apartheid South Afrika is lucid. It's often contrary to what modern intellectuals, often communists resort to; of using verbose language that tends to lose the reader even thought the aim of any written word is to be read. Biko's simplicity is difficult to understand given that the late ‘60s and seventies were characterised by a proliferation of revolutionaries as Harold MacMillan’s winds of change were sweeping not only Africa but Latin America and the Middle East. With Palestinians, Sandinistas, Che Guevaras and Ayatollahs (bubbling under) all in their element, Biko crafted his message to speak to Black South Afrikans but with a solidarity theme that would have inspired Palestinians in a refugee camp to continue fighting.

It is a message of universal self-love rather than pan-Africanism. It’s not Black consciousness for the sake of social expediency but also to hand over humanity to an oppressor. Biko noticed that the oppressor was also a victim of their sense of self-importance. He spoke to them in a language they were comfortable using against Blacks. He realised that all oppressors the world over needed was to be brought back to mother earth and admit that they were not the most intelligent folks simply because they were born 'white'. "No race has a monopoly to wisdom", an earlier philosopher echoed.

The literary merit of Biko's work is unquestionable to the extent that it beats me why do we have Durban University of Technology Steve Biko Campus and Memorial Hospital while this book; which should be prescribed for all school grades; from eight to 12 is in the fringes. I still have to see an indigenous language translation of this book sponsored by the Language Board. I still need to see one essay used during the Grade 12 examinations. To navigate the future in harmony both Black and white children need to find themselves between the pages of this beautiful narrative. There's nowhere in the book where Biko says, 'fuck white people. I hate white people. I detest white people'

Nation-building needs not denote shying away from peeling scabs to expose the pus and clean the wound but to be able to prescribe amputation if it’s the best solution. South Afrika has a lot of septic wounds that need attention. Like chemotherapy it will hurt to some white people but one rather live without a bad tooth than to endure unnecessary pain caused by a dying doctrine. Apartheid, in Biko's mind was never really feasible; sad that it took Boers so long to notice that.

Biko didn’t need to be creative like artists as this book is made up of essays and letters he wrote for the consumption of different people. However in his twenties Biko had enough brain cells in his head to put to shame some 40-years old (who loves eating sushi ontop of naked women) who would write long diatribes to respond to Biko saying, “material want is bad enough; coupled with spiritual poverty it kills” [page 30]. I hope Kenny Kunene reads; not only this post but Biko's book as well.


TO COMMENT ON THIS POST GO TO OUR FACEBOOK PAGE: THE Kasiekulture BLOG & write your comment on the wall